...loading...

user comments

thank you, come again!
Froogle 1.1.1.7
Froogled By:
Elias Makere, FSA, MAAA
Last Froogled:

ASOP 1 | §2.5 | COMMENT ON SECTION 2.5

CommentResponse
There were a number of comments on this section:
• A commentator suggested that the ASOP not define material since “materiality” standards are normally imposed by others, and where they aren’t there isn’t a difference between significance and materiality. The commentator suggested using the materiality definition to define significant instead.

• A commentator indicated that the statement “The provisions of ASOPs need not be applied to immaterial items” was somewhat circular, because an actuary would need to apply the ASOP to determine that an item is immaterial and that the ASOP allows it to be disregarded.

• A commentator indicated that information should be required to be disclosed to allow others to make an assessment of the reasonability of the decision to exclude items as immaterial.
The reviewers note that the words “material” and “materiality” are used in a number of ASOPs and, therefore, retaining the discussion is appropriate. The reviewers disagree with the other two comments.
Congratulations! You're now Froogled Up™ on Commentary 2.5 from ASOP 1!

Feel free to use it throughout your financial/insurance life.

Sincerely,



www.FroogleMe.com
You Might Also Like
All-in-One Commentary 2: Comments & Responses on Section 2 of the Exposure Draft